The four products are the surfaces you see. Underneath them runs one engine: the nerve center that connects your code, your cloud, your containers, and the vulnerability intelligence behind them. It is why the answer to "can this actually be exploited?" is the same whether a risk shows up in a dependency, a line of code, or a running container. And it is why a policy you write once is enforced in every pipeline you have.
The products decide where Moolé looks. The platform decides how it thinks. These are the parts that run under all four, so the verdict, the map, and the rules stay consistent no matter where a risk turns up.
The core. It ranks every finding by whether the code is reachable and whether a real exploit path exists. This is the part that turns thousands of alerts into a short list worth fixing.
A living map connecting your code, dependencies, containers, and cloud. One flaw can be traced from where it lives to what it actually touches, so nothing is judged in isolation.
One dashboard across every repo, team, and product. Instead of four tools with four views, you get a single picture of where your risk sits and who owns it.
Write a rule once and enforce it at every stage: the pull request, CI, the registry, and runtime. The same policy engine runs at each point, so the standard never drifts.
Connects to the tools your team already uses: source control, pipelines, editors, registries, and chat. Moolé fits into the workflow rather than asking the workflow to change.
Enterprise controls for who can see and do what: role-based access, SSO and SAML sign-on, and permissions scoped to teams. The right people get the right view, and no more.
Leadership rollups and audit-ready reports mapped to the frameworks you answer to: SOC 2, PCI, HIPAA, NIST, and CIS. The evidence is ready before the request lands.
Findings routed to Slack and Jira, in the flow of work. The person who needs to act sees it where they already are, not in a portal they have to remember to open.
Most teams end up with different rules in different places: one thing checked in the editor, another in CI, something else at the registry, and nothing at all in production. Moolé runs the same policy engine at every point along the way. A rule you write once is applied the moment code is authored, again in CI, again at the registry, and again on what is actually running.
A security rule written once is enforced at authorship, in CI, at the registry, and on what runs. The same engine sits at every node, so a standard set by one team holds across all of them, with no second tool to argue with.
Different tools drift.
One engine does not.
The Switchboard is not one more dashboard to remember. It plugs into the tools your team already uses every day: their source control, their pipelines, their editor, their container registries, and their chat. Findings show up in the pull request and the ticket queue, not in a portal nobody opens.
Stitch four separate scanners together and you inherit four verdicts, four dashboards, and four sets of rules that never quite agree. One platform removes that friction. Here is what that buys you.
One exploitability engine judges a dependency, a line of code, and a container the same way. There is no arguing between tools about whether a finding is real, because there is only one answer.
Every repo, team, and product roll up into a single view. You look once to know where you stand, instead of reconciling four exports into a spreadsheet.
Write the rule once and it holds from the editor to runtime. No copy of the policy drifts out of date in a tool someone forgot about.
Results land where the work already happens, in the PR and the ticket, not in a portal nobody opens. The fix gets seen because it comes to the person, not the other way around.
Four products. One brain.
One answer.